UGC NET June 2026 Exam Row: English Questions Repeated, Sociology Errors Reported

The UGC NET June 2026 examination has drawn attention after candidates alleged that a significant number of questions in the English Paper II were repeated from a previous examination. Alongside these claims, several aspirants who appeared for the Sociology Paper II reported grammatical mistakes, typographical errors and inaccurate Hindi translations in the question paper. While these allegations have gained attention following media reports and candidate feedback, the National Testing Agency (NTA) has not issued any official statement confirming or rejecting the claims. Candidates are now awaiting further clarification from the examination authority regarding the reported issues.

UGC NET June 2026 English Paper: Candidates Allege 67 Questions Were Repeated

According to reports, candidates claimed that 67 out of the 150 questions in the UGC NET English Paper II were identical to questions asked in an examination conducted approximately two years ago. The allegations suggest that both the question statements and answer options matched those from the earlier examination. If accurate, nearly half of the English Paper II would consist of previously used questions. However, no official confirmation has been provided by the examination authority regarding these claims. At present, candidates are relying on unofficial comparisons and media reports while awaiting a formal response from the NTA.

UGC NET June 2026 Exam Pattern

The UGC NET examination is conducted in two papers to assess candidates for eligibility for Assistant Professor and Junior Research Fellowship (JRF), depending on the applicable criteria. The examination pattern includes:

Sociology Paper II Faces Allegations of Grammatical and Typographical Errors

Apart from concerns regarding the English paper, candidates also raised objections about the quality of the UGC NET Sociology Paper II conducted on June 30, 2026. According to candidate feedback reported in the media, the Sociology paper allegedly contained:

• Spelling mistakes
• Grammatical errors
• Incorrect academic terminology
• Poorly framed questions
• Typographical mistakes

Several candidates claimed that these errors created confusion during the examination and affected the overall readability of the paper.

Reported Errors Highlighted by Candidates

Candidates reportedly pointed out multiple examples of alleged mistakes in the Sociology question paper. Among the reported errors were:

• "Ritzer" printed as "Putzer"
• "Social" printed as "Oval"
• "Parsons" printed as "Parsow"
• "Ghurye" printed as "Ghunye"
• "A R Desai" printed as "A K Desai"

Candidates argued that such mistakes involved well-known sociologists and widely recognised academic terms, making them particularly concerning in a national eligibility examination. These examples are based on candidate claims and have not been officially verified by the NTA.

Candidates Also Raise Concerns Over Hindi Translation

In addition to spelling and grammatical issues, several aspirants alleged that the Hindi translations of multiple Sociology questions were inaccurate or difficult to interpret. According to candidates, translation discrepancies may have created confusion for bilingual candidates attempting the examination. Some aspirants also claimed that certain questions appeared to include topics or thinkers that they believed were outside the prescribed syllabus, although these allegations have not been officially confirmed.

NTA Yet to Issue Official Statement

Despite the concerns raised by candidates, the National Testing Agency (NTA) has not released any official clarification regarding:

• The alleged repetition of English Paper II questions.
• Reported grammatical or typographical errors.
• Translation-related concerns.
• Claims regarding questions beyond the syllabus.

Candidates are advised to wait for official communication before drawing conclusions regarding the examination. Any clarification, correction or further action will be announced only through official channels if deemed necessary.

What Could Happen Next?

If examination authorities review the reported issues, they may evaluate candidate representations along with expert observations before taking any decision. Possible outcomes, if required, could include:

• Review of candidate objections.
• Expert examination of disputed questions.
• Clarifications through official notices.
• Consideration during answer key evaluation.

What Should Candidates Do Now?

Candidates who appeared in the UGC NET June 2026 examination should continue following the official examination schedule.Any updates regarding answer keys, objections or examination review will be communicated through official announcements. Applicants are advised to:

• Monitor official notifications from the NTA.
• Wait for the provisional answer key.
• Review official objection guidelines once released.
• Preserve examination records for future reference.
• Avoid relying on unverified claims shared on social media.

Importance of Accuracy in National-Level Examinations

National-level eligibility examinations require a high standard of accuracy in question framing, language and translation. Minor typographical or grammatical errors may sometimes occur in competitive examinations, but concerns involving repeated questions or inaccuracies are generally reviewed carefully by examination authorities whenever formal representations are received. Maintaining transparency and consistency in the examination process remains important for ensuring confidence among candidates.

UGC NET June 2026 Exam Controversy: Key Highlights

The UGC NET June 2026 examination has come under scrutiny after candidates alleged that 67 questions in the English Paper II were repeated from a previous examination and that the Sociology Paper II contained grammatical, typographical and translation errors. The reported mistakes include incorrect spellings of prominent sociologists and academic terms. As of now, the National Testing Agency (NTA) has not issued any official statement regarding these allegations, and candidates are advised to await official clarification and the release of the answer key before reaching any conclusions.