A recent development in school evaluation patterns has raised strong concern among educators and parents after Class one to five students were assigned one hundred-mark summative assessment papers. The situation has triggered debate around age-appropriate learning and whether current testing formats align with child-centric education standards.
Teachers noted that many students struggled to complete lengthy question papers, highlighting a gap between curriculum expectations and the developmental pace of early learners. The issue has also revived questions about assessment reforms introduced under the National Education Policy.
Primary Education Pressure: One Hundred-Mark Exams Worry Experts
The concern primarily revolves around the nature of the summative assessment, which was designed for older students but is now being administered to younger classes. Educators argue that extended writing tasks, multiple sections, and structured questions are not developmentally suitable for children aged between six and ten. Parents also reported that students required additional tuition hours to cope with the format, creating an unintended financial burden on families. Several teachers stressed that such exam patterns may undermine learning outcomes and motivation in early grades. With foundational learning identified as a national priority, experts believe that immediate corrective measures are necessary.
Impact on Foundational Learning Standards in Schools
Before looking at structured concerns, it is essential to understand how this assessment pattern affects daily classroom learning. Primary school students typically learn through short activities, guided worksheets, and interactive teaching. Introducing one hundred-mark papers shifts the focus toward memorisation, increased writing load, and exam-oriented preparation. Teachers noted that classroom time is now spent on repeated drilling of practice tests rather than conceptual learning. Younger students often struggle to write continuously for extended durations, leading to incomplete papers and higher anxiety levels. Many educators believe this approach may damage confidence levels and reduce long-term academic curiosity. Below is a summary of the major issues raised by school staff and parents:
Key Concerns Reported by Schools
- One hundred-mark papers exceed the writing capacity of early learners.
- Curriculum pacing becomes exam-centric instead of concept-focused.
- Students experience stress, especially in Classes one, two, and three.
- Parents report increased dependence on tuition support.
- Teachers suggest a shift to activity-based and competency-based assessments.
Call for Policy Review to Protect Young Learners
Education experts believe that revisiting assessment frameworks for Classes one to five is essential to maintain the integrity of foundational learning. While academic evaluation remains important, the method must remain age-appropriate and aligned with cognitive development benchmarks. Discussions within school management committees are expected to continue in the coming weeks, with requests submitted for policy revisions.
Follow KollegeApply for the latest updates on College Admissions, Courses, Exam Dates, Results, Scholarships, Career Guidance, Education News, and Policy Changes — everything needed to stay ahead in the education journey
