KollegeApply logo

KollegeApply

Key Constitutional Judgments for CLAT PG 2026 Preparation | Study

2 minute read

• Updated on 16 Sep, 2025, by Kollegeapply

Key Constitutional Judgments for CLAT PG 2026 Preparation | Study

Today is 16 September 2025, and candidates preparing for CLAT PG 2026 are advised to focus on landmark constitutional judgments. Understanding these judgments is crucial for success in the examination, as they form a significant portion of the syllabus. The CLAT PG 2026 exam will test aspirants on various aspects of constitutional law, including amendments, judicial review, and landmark rulings. Candidates must carefully revise key cases to strengthen their preparation strategy.

 

Important Constitutional Judgments for CLAT PG 2026 Preparation

Candidates should prioritise the following judgments while preparing for CLAT PG 2026. Each of these cases holds significant importance in understanding the Indian Constitution:

S. No

Case Name

Key Takeaways

1

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973)

Established the “basic structure” doctrine, restricting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution beyond its core principles.

2

Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain (1975)

Struck down the 39th Amendment, which had attempted to shield the Prime Minister’s election from judicial review.

3

Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978)

Expanded Article 21 rights, establishing the principle of due process for personal liberty.

4

S.R. Bommai vs Union of India (1994)

Clarified the scope of Article 356, restricting misuse of President’s rule in states.

5

Minerva Mills vs Union of India (1980)

Reinforced the basic structure doctrine and limited the power of Parliament to amend fundamental rights.

These judgments are repeatedly referenced in CLAT PG previous papers and form the backbone of questions related to constitutional law. Aspirants are advised to read the full judgments and note the key principles, judicial reasoning, and impact on Indian law.

 

How Candidates Should Prepare?

Candidates should:

  • Analyse each judgment in detail, noting the constitutional provisions involved.
  • Focus on the impact of these rulings on fundamental rights and parliamentary powers.
  • Practice previous year questions related to landmark cases for better retention.

Studying these key cases will enable candidates to answer both direct and application-based questions effectively in CLAT PG 2026. For detailed reference and more judgments, candidates can visit the official CLAT PG preparation sources and legal news portals.

Students learning mobile

Your opinion matters to us!

Rate your experience using this page so far.